Publication Ethics

1. Introduction: The "Corporate Governance & Audit Archive Review" is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics. This Publication Ethics Policy outlines the principles and guidelines that authors, reviewers, editors, and the editorial team must adhere to in order to ensure the integrity, transparency, and quality of the published content.

2. Authorship and Originality:

• Authors must ensure that the submitted manuscript is an original work and has not been published elsewhere.
• All co-authors should have made a significant contribution to the research and writing process, and they should be listed appropriately.
• Proper acknowledgment of sources, including funding and data sources, must be provided.

3. Plagiarism:

• Plagiarism in any form is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
• Authors should ensure that their work is free from plagiarism, and any quoted material must be properly cited.
• The editorial team will use plagiarism detection tools to check the originality of submitted manuscripts.

4. Data and Results Accuracy:

• Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the data presented in their manuscripts.
• Falsification or manipulation of data is considered unethical and will lead to the rejection of the manuscript.
• Raw data should be available for review upon request.

5. Conflicts of Interest:

• Authors must disclose any financial, personal, or professional relationships that may influence the research or interpretation of results.
• Reviewers and editors should also declare any conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from the review process if necessary.

6. Peer Review Process:

• The peer review process is essential for maintaining the quality and validity of published content.
• Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback.
• Editors will ensure a fair and unbiased review process, and decisions will be based on the manuscript's merit.

7. Editorial Independence:

• Editorial decisions will be based solely on the quality of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal's scope.
• Editors will avoid any potential conflicts of interest and maintain confidentiality throughout the review process.