Peer Review Policy

1. Introduction

The "Corporate Governance & Audit Archive Review" (CGAR) is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research on corporate governance, auditing, and related topics. This policy outlines the expectations and procedures for peer review of manuscripts submitted to CGAR.

2. Objectives of Peer Review

To ensure the scientific quality, originality, and significance of published articles.
To provide constructive feedback to authors to improve the clarity, accuracy, and impact of their work.
To maintain the integrity and reputation of CGAR as a leading journal in its field.

3. Selection of Peer Reviewers

Editors will select reviewers based on their expertise, experience, and knowledge of the relevant subject area.
Reviewers will be chosen to ensure a diversity of perspectives and to avoid potential conflicts of interest.
Reviewers will be informed of the journal's ethical guidelines and expected standards for peer review.

4. Review Process

All submitted manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer review process.
Each manuscript will be assigned to two independent reviewers.
Reviewers will be provided with a clear set of review criteria, including:
- Originality and significance of the research
- Soundness of the research methodology
- Clarity and accuracy of the writing
- Quality of the data analysis and interpretation
- Relevance to the journal's scope and audience
Reviewers will be asked to provide a detailed written report, including specific comments and suggestions for improvement.
Editors will consider the reviewers' comments and make a final decision on the manuscript (accept, reject, or request revisions).

5. Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to:
- Maintain the confidentiality of the review process.
- Provide fair, objective, and constructive feedback to authors.
- Declare any potential conflicts of interest.
- Complete the review process in a timely manner.
- Adhere to the journal's ethical guidelines.